Tag: Janet Difiore

ATTENTION DO IT YOURSELFERS

Don’t know what you think, but I’m the kind of guy who likes to do things for himself. That’s why I’m just crazy about this new do-it-yourself Guardianship Kit. Why pay fancy legal fees when you can just fill out the forms yourself with your own pencils and get a Guardian you know you can trust who’s just as good as anything you’d pay for.  Operators are standing by.

Actually, no need to call. Check out the web site for CUNY/Main Street Legal Service.  OCA/ Surrogates also has a full complement of the forms needed in Surrogates, which you can adapt.

I’m not in private practice, but if I was, my question would be, “What did we ever do to you guys to deserve this?”    Why not set up a free chicken BBQ in front of KFC while you’re at it?

[Oh, Damn. The Old Bastard is ranting again. Who brought up pro bono petitions after I gave strict instructions to avoid the topic?]

What urgent need is being met here? We have a tsunami of matrimonials being conducted without lawyers.  Ask a matrimonial referee how much fun it is to preside over these proceedings without any sane adult supervision. Apparently, the aim is to afford the guardianship courts the same high quality of judicial decorum and legal representation that they now have in the uncontested matrimonial parts.

Mind you, the good folks at CUNY/Main Street make a valiant effort to discourage their customers. “We recommend that all people who can hire an attorney!”

Sorry, not good enough. Clumsy wording too, but WTF.  You’re handing out heroin on the street corner with strict product warnings. Nobody drawn to use these materials is in any mood to read any warning labels. They are enchanted with the free aspect of the thing. More of Grandpa’s money for me; what a great deal.

This means that no lawyer has looked at their petition. This matters  because most lawyers, when they talk to the pro bono people [one gets the feeling some of these have already been rejected by lawyers], will realize that most have no business seeking a Guardian, for a variety of reasons.

Should I list some reasons?  A lot of them are families quarreling over parental assets, not waiting for the loved one to meet his/her maker. Pre-death probate fight, you might say. Others are tenants who have exhausted their remedies in Housing Court. And there are the pure of heart,  well-meaning but with no ability or temperament  to prosecute these cases, and even if they did, they have no ability to fulfill the obligations that they seek, and aren’t all too sure what they are looking for, except that Dad really is out of control these days.

A solution in search of a problem.

In this way we will provide more access to justice by helping people come to court without an attorney? Why not free access to medical treatment rendered without doctors or nurses, or even clinicians?

Might I respectfully suggest that this is more about access than it is about justice.

Guardianship lawyers should not sit back quietly and let their livelihoods be do-gooded out of existence.

The Bar Associations should be letting OCA know that they are not pleased, and that there will be repercussions. For candidates for judicial office, I think that’s spelled r-e-p-e-r-c-u-$-$-i-o-n-$.

But honestly, CUNY’s materials are great. Its good shit, as they used to say on the street, or at least in those cop shows in the 70’s.

Many of the lawyers now practicing in Guardianship would do well to download these materials, and scrap the stuff they are using now. Presumably they’ll read the directions better than the pro se’s do.

How about we do this instead: Why not expand resources to give legal representation to all who need it, and who have valid cases? There are thousands of young, bushy-tailed law students who would provide most of the labor.  But how about we triage these things, and weed out the petitions that should never see daylight?  And have a real guardianship attorney supervise. This is basically what Main Street does, but they are a small operation.

Threshholds and guidelines, weeding out bad cases at their inception. We were supposedly doing this in med mal [a huge success by all accounts].  Why not a threshold standard for guardianship filings?  Or are only the med mal insurance carriers entitled to special protections? How about AIPs and the families of wacky pro se petitioners?

The Courts routinely do something like this with the personal injury lawyers who don’t know a Guardian ad litem from an Article 81 Guardian. We gently but firmly refer them to CPLR Art 12, and have a nice day.

We have all we can handle with providing competent legal  representation for the millions facing heavy prison time; is the solution handing out home defend-a-felony packets?

Of course, it’s just a matter of time before Amazon gets its hooks into this; drones that will represent you in court.  One day delivery with prime.

I get it; the damage is done, you can’t un-ring the bell. The materials are out there, and highly popular. We’re stuck with this for the foreseeable future.

Well, the Courts – and by that I mean the Judges and their staffs – don’t have to take this lying down.

Here’s what the courts have to do to protect themselves from the free formers:

Identify all the pro se petitions, analyze how many of them go through to hearing, how long the hearings take and how they are conducted, how many actually result in the appointment of a guardian, how many qualify, how many marshal funds and account to the court, annually and final.

Then we’ll have the data to demonstrate whether this is really a problem or not. It’s my well informed guess, and anecdotal experience that it is. If it’s not, then never mind, and you Guardianship lawyers, why don’t you find something else to do.

Maybe matrimonial.

But assuming my guess is correct, here’s what comes next:

Never sign a pro se petition unless you have first called in the petitioner and put them on the stand. At minimum, you can ascertain whether they understood the written directions. If the petition is good, you might even appoint an attorney for them. If not, decline to sign.

No joke: some of these petitioners themselves need a guardian.

Don’t schedule the hearing until a witness list has been provided.  Maybe appoint MHLS as Court Evaluator to report back to the Court before the hearing is scheduled.  Hold the hearing date in abeyance until you know what’s going on.

Never appoint a pro se guardian of the property unless you fix a bond to guarantee their performance.

Deny petitions unless there is clear and convincing evidence; I mean really do it, don’t just say it.

Never appoint a pro se guardian with normal powers; limited is the way to go. Make them short term, bring them in to see how they are doing with the specific goals that were set for them after 6 months.  This should be s.o.p.  The MHL lets you do it, and these remedies are there for a reason.

The Surrogates Court  has simple guardianships, which are restricted in scope. Let’s steer as many of these cases there as can be done responsibly and conscientiously. Or is that the same thing?

Meanwhile as we open up the exciting career of legal practice to all, even to those without the capabilities of advocating responsibly, and  quite a few who are using court proceedings for the purposes of vindicating irrational grievances, let’s take a look at the real problems we are neglecting by spending so many of our judicial resources on this feel-good exercise:

We have more elderly asset exploitation in our city than we even know exists –

We have more schizophrenic/mentally disturbed tenants living in unspeakable filth than the city knows what to do with.

That’s two just to start.

How about we start identifying the problem areas and looking for ways to focus in on them?

And how about a Public Guardianship, just to start? When did someone first suggest this, 1993? It will all flow downhill from there.

As people always say,  a panacea to solve all problems.  This literally makes my head explode.

Remember: “Literally” doesn’t mean” literally” any more.

But let’s put an end to Forms  Over  Substance.

Uplifting Conclusion.

And so this is Christmas, which President*  Donald Trump just restored to the calendar, so let’ s look at the bright side.

By and large, Guardianship Court is not so bad, and it is not so plagued with festering problems as the rest of our Court. In fact, the Guardianship Parts, by comparison with their peers, are pretty damn good.

I didn’t say perfect.

If you are Janet Difiore — aside from the fun and games screwball Judges play periodically with shitty appointments in places like Long Island and Brooklyn, stories which make the tabloids gleeful — your attention is more often drawn to the non-guardianship side of things. For example, why does it take years to get a jury trial in some parts of the city, which is a direct attack on the commercial aspect of the legal profession, which sort of pays the bills around here.  Fed up lawyers and their clients have long been voting with their feet, diverting cases from the courts to mediation. This is a problem, folks. And the litigation loan industry is a ticking time bomb that the courts and the bar have refused to acknowledge or regulate. [Because it’s more lucrative than the practice of law?]

The laws of time and space preclude the listing of them all, but I’ll get to most of them eventually, don’t you worry.

But Guardianship chugs along, basically doing a creditable job.  Thanks to the Birnbaum commission, we have centralized the cases in each borough in front of one or a few judges, and  by and large, we have the better judges doing Guardianship.

And this after we prematurely  lost Joel Asarch, who was very good indeed. Before this, we also lost the nonpareil Charlie Devlin, the best of them all, who was professionally murdered by idiots at OCA, which is a story for another time.

The chief clerks in the boroughs doing this work are very impressive as a group, and unlike the rest of the court system, for the most part, you make a motion, and you get an answer in reasonably expeditious fashion.  It’s amazing how well people do their jobs when you give them no choice to do otherwise.

And the Guardianship Judges [generally speaking] really know their stuff, because it’s their steady gig. Nice.

Your actual mileage may vary, but……

Always look on the bright side of life.

So until next time, tra la la la la, and let nothing you despair.

WHY BLOG ABOUT ARTICLE 81 GUARDIANSHIP

What excitement, a N.Y. court blog.  So 1997.  Who does that anymore? What is a blog anyway? Is it stream-of-consciousness musings, like a dopey Larry King column? Remember those? Something like:

 

“Why do people say that you can’t put cheese on fish sauce? Did you ever have au gratin crab or shrimp? Delicious. What’s the difference? Next time you’re in a restaurant….etc”

Nah, none of that here. I’ll do my best, but bear with me. I’m old. I was stabbed to death by greedy centurions in 193 AD. [They got away with it too; even then Dennis Quirk had enormous clout] You think I should bother trying to keep abreast of the latest and greatest? To hell with that.  I may be dead, but I’m not doing Facebook. That’s final.

Let’s talk about the recent past, the last two months, August and September. It was Janet Defiore’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Summer. And like so many bad things, it came in threes. [Yeah, Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres. Got that out of my system. Any idea how sick of this phrase we ancient Romans are?]

It started with that Bookstaver guy butt-dialing to a NY Post Reporter an account of how he maintained a pricey no-show job, courtesy of a deal between the outgoing Chief Handsome John Lippman and J. Difiore.

The butt-dial guy was being paid good money to do PR. How good at this was he, do you suppose?

This happens at a time when the Court is whining about not having the money for luxury items, like Part Clerks. [This whining has been going on since 470 BCE].  Fortunately, it was August, when most  NY Times readers  had not yet returned from the Hamptons.

But this was followed by the fiasco in Staten Island, with AJ McMahon, a real charmer by all accounts, meddling in criminal cases. This, after the Powers That Be in the Office of Court Administration [“OCA”] went along with the fiction that McMahon would only handle civil cases in the Isle of Staten, and voluntarily leave the criminal docket to a different A.J., because McMahon’s husband is the District Attorney.   Sure, that’ll work. The only part of this that wasn’t predictable was the taping of the whole thing by a disgruntled chief clerk. Who is gay, and didn’t appreciate mockery about it from Ms. M., who is clearly a class act.  She shopped cases to judges more likely to convict, a practice which is endemic, and which I’ll come back to in a future post.

Then Brooklyn did what it does so well – embarrass the rest of the state court system – when it was revealed that  a Supreme Court Judge, Noach Dear was allowed to sit in the lower, Civil Court [what, did he feel unworthy and want his salary lowered?] on days when the Orthodox had their cases on. Strictly coincidental it wasn’t.  As a politician, these were his Peeps, now his personal defendants of choice.  Again, a Judge drifting over to an area where he/she wasn’t supposed to be.

Hilariously, the Post seemed to imply that Dear did this just because he was uncontrollable, deciding on his own to stroll into Civil Court on nights when defendants of a particular ethnicity had their cases on. The Post  urged the Court System to “rein him in.”  There is no administration in Kings apparently, and no one is in charge of assigning cases or judges;  Judges decide when and where to show up, and they summon forth the cases they want to hear that day.  Next week, Dear might get the urge to drop in at Family Court.  If only there was some way of tracking his movements. Do Post readers actually believe this? Nah, they’re already turned to Page Six.

How would you like to be some plaintiff suing a Hasidem merchant and seeing that the defendant brought his own hometown umpire?  [the City of New York picks its own favorite Judges to hear their cases, but I digress]. There is a well-founded, although distasteful rumor that the clerks in Kings have come to refer to those days as “Jewsdays.”

My good friend The Google tells me that the Administrative Judge for Civil Term in Brooklyn is Lawrence Knipel. Hello Larry. And Larry Marx [Hello Second Larry] and J. Difiore have no idea where Judges are being assigned on the other side of the East River? The telegraph lines went down years ago I guess. Forget it Jake; its Brooklyn.

Here’s what’s going to happen, and I say this with the assurance of a Roman Emperor who lasted all of 87 days [People Tell Me that no Emperor was ever better than me at predicting things,  at least for 86 days]- Most likely, nothing will happen, until there’s another scandal. Then,  J. Difiore or Larry Marx  will issue some sort of silly edict – let’s say something that tells Court employees that they better show up for work, and not be like Bookstaver, and a nicely printed memorandum will circulate to thrill the hearts of men, or something.

Oh, we did that already?  Sorry.

Better yet, let’s give all of the employees a new form to fill out! How they love forms. That’s the ticket. Then we can hire more clerks to process the forms? Oh, no, we won’t do that. The same clerks we have now will do the processing. But we’ll hire several new supervisors downtown to oversee the form process. Yes, this will work wonderfully.

There will be no impact from all this fancy managin’ on the places that are most out of control, which are, for the most part, those areas lying off the continental US mainland. But this should suffice for their purposes, since the few entities paying any attention to the court system apparently like Janet Di Fiore. So far.

If she should ever becomes governor, that hair will become nationally famous.  But for now, all is well, and we’ll turn again to our affairs.  Hell, we already have.

This happens over and over again – it happened a little while back in the Bronx, when the Times happened to notice that the Criminal Court didn’t do anything, so they did the old misdirection play. They scape-goated a good judge, Alvarado, who was trying like the devil to get his Judges to take the bench on time,  and changed administration, amidst much fan fare. They announced victory later after a decent interval,  with no change whatsoever, except that the newspapers had lost interest, which was the only goal. Running out the clock again. The main problem is that all of this undermines any argument the courts can make about getting more money and more personnel. Why should we waste money on the likes of you, Court System, or on Judges who take dubious paid leaves of absence that last for years, as was the case recently in, oh, Brooklyn, right.  Cuomo despises the Court system, and this plays right into his hands. Happy to help you out,  Governor.

The amazing thing about our Court System is how the counties that screw up the most – I’m training my steely-eyed gaze here on the East Bank of the East River — tend to produce most of the power brokers in OCA. Nice job; here is your reward.

Next Time, or the time after that, I’ll present my ideas for solving every damn problem in the New York Court System, effortlessly and at no cost, because I’m here to help. Remember, pars sanitas velle sanari fuit. Whatever.